{"id":10190,"date":"2025-11-26T14:59:13","date_gmt":"2025-11-26T13:59:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hip.vitagroup.ag\/article-single-patient-record\/"},"modified":"2025-12-18T14:20:32","modified_gmt":"2025-12-18T13:20:32","slug":"article-single-patient-record","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hip.vitagroup.ag\/en\/article-single-patient-record\/","title":{"rendered":"The SPR should build on shared care records"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_section full_width=”stretch_row” el_id=”magazin-titel” el_class=”lichtgrau”][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”” el_class=”headline-xl”]The <\/span>single<\/span> patient<\/span> record<\/span> should<\/span> build<\/span> on <\/span>shared<\/span> care records<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”” el_class=”introduction”]In an <\/span>opinion<\/span> article<\/span> published<\/span> on digitalhealth.net, <\/span>vitagroup’s<\/span> CCO Matt Cox <\/span>explains<\/span> why<\/span> the<\/span> single<\/span> patient<\/span> record<\/span> must<\/span> build<\/span> on <\/span>the<\/span> progress<\/span> already<\/span> achieved<\/span> with<\/span> shared<\/span> care <\/span>records<\/span>. He <\/span>looks<\/span> at <\/span>the<\/span> architectural<\/span> choices<\/span>, <\/span>governance<\/span> questions<\/span>, and <\/span>cultural<\/span> shifts<\/span> required<\/span> to<\/span> make<\/span> a <\/span>truly<\/span> sustainable<\/span> national <\/span>health<\/span> data<\/span> platform<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row full_width=”stretch_row” el_class=”back-button-row lichtgrau” css=”.vc_custom_1689591697517{background-color: #f5f5f5 !important;}”][vc_column]